Sunday, September 1, 2013

Photo Analysis

Photo 2 gives me the most confidence in President Obama.  I believe others would likely feel the same way.

Initial observations show that the President is speaking in what looks like an authoritative manner with hands extended to emphasis importance.  He has a very serious facial expression and his eyes are looking sharply to his right and not and the camera.  He is informally dressed with a dress shirt with sleeves rolled up and no tie or jacket which looks like he has been working very hard or for many hours.  He seems more intelligent, younger and more focused than the man sitting next to him who is looking in the opposite direction and does not seem to be paying close attention.  The background show several large photos of maps of the area and crews at work.  President Obama appears to have a glass of water in front of him still with a lid on it as if he doesn't even have the time for a sip of water.  The camera angle is straight ahead but the President does not seem to consider it of any importance given the large task ahead of him.

The message this photo is conveying is that the President has come to the Coast Guard Station and to ensure this oil spill stopped as soon as possible and there will be no problem cutting through red tape.  The photo appears to be planned with the location and the two high ranking men together but the moment it was taken was spontaneous.  The photographer makes raises some questions such as:

1.  Will President Obama be able to quickly stop the oil spill by meeting with the Coast Guard?
2.  Does Admiral Allen and the Coast Guard have what it takes to help stop this oil spill?
3.  Is the President primarily getting information from the Coast Guard or are they creating a feasible and worthwhile plan?
Obama is more focused than ever about stopping the oil spill.
The President and the Coast Guard disagree on how to handle the oil spill.

The following lesson plan was taking from this link and there are many more available to teach Visual Literacy:

http://www.humanities.umd.edu/vislit/activityplans.php

Media Analysis Assignment 

This assignment asks you to become a cultural critic by applying some of the concepts of cultural analysis to contemporary mass media.  Your sampling of mass media will be two-fold:  (1) a slice of prime time commercial television, not special news coverage and (2) an image from print media such as a magazine.  (1) Select at least a half hour of television to analyze carefully.  Take notes while watching with the prompts below in mind.  (2) In addition, select an advertisement in a recent issue of a magazine aimed specifically at teen age girls or women.  In each instance, your analysis will focus on the representations of women in these cultural artifacts.   

I.  TV Analysis (2 -3 pages)
Your analysis will emerge out of your reflections about and responses to the prompts below.  You may simply submit your work as a series of  numbered responses to the prompts.  While this assignment does not require you to write a formal essay, your responses should be carefully and thoughtfully written. Remember to incorporate specific examples from the TV program you watched to illustrate your analysis.  

  1. Who is the probable intended audience(s) for the television show you are analyzing?  What factors contribute to your awareness of audience?  Consider not only gender but also age, race/ethnicity, geographic location, etc. 
  2. Is there a relationship between the plot/action/narrative of the television show and the commercials that accompany it?  To the target audience(s)? Explain.  
  1. Do the women who appear differ from one another, and if so, how?  What is the relative frequency of women by age? By race/ethnicity? Are women (or anyone else) represented who are differently abled?  According to dominant cultural ideals of beauty, how many women portrayed fall into the categories of 'beautiful,' 'average,' or 'unattractive'?  What range of weight is represented between the women and the men and among the women themselves?
  2. In what roles do women appear (or not appear)? Do they play multiple roles (e.g. wife, mother, lover, worker?)  What types of jobs do they hold?  How much time to they appear to devote to their different roles?  What kinds of work do they do?  Can you see any difference in the roles assigned to women or to men? 
  3. What level of education do the men and women seem to hold? Do you find women represented who appear to be of working-class backgrounds or to be poor?  Are they major or minor characters?  Are they portrayed sympathetically or used in ways that perpetuate stereotypes about race or class?  
  4. What is the relationship of women in the show to the products being advertised in commercials? Does it vary from program to program, from channel to channel? Is there any evidence of a famous assertion that in public representations of gender, men do the looking and women are there to be looked at? What influence, if any, can you see in the three decades plus of feminism's attempts to influence the representation of women in the media? 

II. Print Ad Analysis  
  1. Who is the probable intended audience(s) for the magazine ad you are analyzing?  Explain your answer.  What is the print ad trying to sell?  How does it make its appeal to the potential consumer?  Does it appear to have any particular relationship to the articles accompanying it in the magazine?  In your analysis of the print ad, focus on how women’s bodies are positioned in the ad, whom they are looking at, whom is looking at them, what they are wearing, etc.  In what ways does the ad emphasize or construct women’s sexuality?  How does it (or does it?) construct women’s abilities to be their own subjects rather than objects to be looked at?  


4 comments:

  1. Macy, I enjoyed reading your analysis. I felt that you were very pertinent with your information. One thing that I noticed that you said was the scene itself, the two men and the discussion, was indeed posed and planned. However, what you said was that the photo was spontaneous. I simply said that the photo was spontaneous without taking into consideration that the event as a whole was planned. I feel that helped me more with the analysis. Also, I enjoyed the questions that you posed. They were much better than the ones I came up with. Great analysis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Macy,
    We shared a lot of the same beliefs with our photo analysis. I agree that picture two displays a lot more confidence in the president because it shows him in action. However, your caption for the picture was a lot different than mine. I simply put something along the lines of “President Obama taking care of this oil spill.” I like the way you focused on the disagreement between him and the coast guard. It makes me think more about the picture and analyze it in a different light. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. We saw Obama's clothing situation differently. I saw the fact that he wasn't dressed up to be a negative aspect of this picture. You said he looked like he had been working because of the outfit he was wearing. I see now that those clothes are kind of working clothes. I agree with you that the event was all planned but the picture itself was an actual action shot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think we both liked Photo 2 for the same reasons, and we noticed many of the same thing- how he has his sleeves rolled up to get the job done, etc. Where we seemed to differ is how I interpreted his facial expression as optimistic. He has a slight grin, and he looks as if he is not as worried as he appears to be in photo one. Great analyis!

    ReplyDelete